Asus MAXIMUS V GENE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V GENE  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 26 '20 at 08:27
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770S-$95
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87% Excellent
Memory 95.4
1-Core 117
2-Core 233
85% 149 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 573
64% 502 Pts
64-Core 573
36% 573 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 87%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Zotac(19DA 1476) 2GB
CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 1900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Lighting 21.1
Reflection 17.2
Parallax 20.2
17% 19.5 fps
MRender 20.3
Gravity 20.4
Splatting 22
17% 20.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 256GB
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0628A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 351 169 83 97 88 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 59%
WD WD20NPVZ-00W 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 84 91 91 91 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 98.4
Write 86.9
Mixed 35.4
SusWrite 90.3
57% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 62%
HGST HTS 541010A9E680 1TB
930GB free, PID 022e
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 96 96 97 97 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 95.6
Write 93.7
Mixed 37.1
SusWrite 95
107% 80.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
63.1% Good
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 19.8
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 20.4
57% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 55.8
72% 55.8 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS V GENE Builds (Compare 797 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V GENE - $972

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,364
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback