Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive311% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 25 '20 at 23:44
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel 0000
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Memory 96.5
1-Core 132
2-Core 228
88% 152 Pts
4-Core 528
8-Core 1,031
92% 779 Pts
64-Core 1,372
85% 1,372 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.67
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 53% Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 10 Volume 16TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 214 214 217 218 217 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 352
Write 209
Mixed 89.8
SusWrite 216
48% 217 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 9.6
4K Mixed 2.5
27% 8.07 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 10
DQ Mixed 5.5
25% 61.8 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 124%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249
672GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1868 1957 1964 1977 1983 1967 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
311% Outstanding
Read 2,198
Write 1,776
Mixed 1,013
SusWrite 1,953
389% 1,735 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 58.6
202% 73.7 MB/s
DQ Read 809
DQ Write 1,071
DQ Mixed 879
681% 920 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 311%
Great: 363%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3333 C16 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
163% Outstanding
MC Read 68.1
MC Write 67.8
MC Mixed 59.9
186% 65.3 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 26.8
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 52.1
77% 52.1 ns
Poor: 105%
This bench: 163%
Great: 176%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 Builds (Compare 1,061 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 - $485

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $1,470
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback