Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (2nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 98 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics38.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200428
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJul 25 '20 at 19:02
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
50.6% Above average
Memory 50
1-Core 87.8
2-Core 158
54% 98.7 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 519
47% 397 Pts
64-Core 827
51% 827 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5500-XT-$217
MSI(1462 3822) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.7.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.3% Below average
Lighting 45.2
Reflection 35.8
Parallax 69.4
37% 50.2 fps
MRender 51.2
Gravity 48.4
Splatting 50.7
41% 50.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NIMFB2-0480M2 480GB
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 210 195 228 224 223 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
45% Average
Read 310
Write 208
Mixed 241
SusWrite 217
55% 244 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 10.5
4K Mixed 12
40% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 95.9
DQ Mixed 139
108% 153 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 45%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL16-18-18 D4-2666 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
26.4% Poor
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 9.5
28% 9.93 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 5.2
13% 4.6 GB/s
Latency 161
25% 161 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,712 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $407
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback