Asus H81M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics30.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H81M-C  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161021
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '20 at 19:51
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 92.8
1-Core 104
2-Core 205
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 387
53% 394 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.77
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Lighting 38.2
Reflection 30.4
Parallax 36.8
31% 35.2 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 37
Splatting 35.4
30% 37 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240G 240GB
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1001A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 264 62 46 57 62 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 457
Write 324
Mixed 398
SusWrite 144
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 99.2
4K Mixed 32.5
149% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 48.9
97% 191 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
668GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 169 169 171 171 172 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 105
Write 83.2
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 169
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BDW0-GN-F Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
61.6% Good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 18.7
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 19.7
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 62.4
64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 3,025 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $56

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $293
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback