Acer Aspire E5-575

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.63% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive75.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire E5-575  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Ironman_SK
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171024
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '20 at 14:20
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6157U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Memory 64.7
1-Core 74.5
2-Core 134
54% 91 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 211
28% 211 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Graphics 550
Acer(1025 1094) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6286
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
9.63% Terrible
Lighting 10.8
Reflection 10.9
Parallax 11
9% 10.9 fps
MRender 12.5
Gravity 10.4
Splatting 16.7
11% 13.2 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.63%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30001P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 184 231 231 224 215 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 436
Write 218
Mixed 199
SusWrite 219
59% 268 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 63.2
4K Mixed 23
104% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 175
164% 260 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT4G4SFS824A.M8FE Kingston ACR24D4S7S1MB-4 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
MC Read 24.1
MC Write 48.4
MC Mixed 21.5
90% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 14.9
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-575 Builds (Compare 945 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-575

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback