Dell Precision 7920 Tower

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision 7920 Tower  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 060K5C
Memory87.8 GB free of 96 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '20 at 11:58
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Gold 6248
CPU0, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 76.9
1-Core 111
2-Core 210
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 807
71% 602 Pts
64-Core 2,417
150% 2,417 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P620
Dell(1028 1264) 2GB
CLim: 1354 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.05
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Lighting 23.5
Reflection 21.9
Parallax 19.1
19% 21.5 fps
MRender 24.4
Gravity 21.1
Splatting 20.4
18% 22 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MG04ACA400NY 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: FK5D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 26 29 9.1 11 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 176
Write 33.2
Mixed 42
SusWrite 23
50% 68.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GR7JJR8N-VK 6x16GB
6 of 24 slots used
96GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
163% Outstanding
MC Read 63
MC Write 80.1
MC Mixed 61.1
194% 68.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 9.8
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 86.4
46% 86.4 ns
Poor: 133%
This bench: 163%
Great: 167%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision 7920 Tower Builds (Compare 808 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: Dell Precision 7920 Tower

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback