Acer Aspire V5-591G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire V5-591G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Usopp_SLS
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171019
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJul 24 '20 at 11:27
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 102
2-Core 191
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 359
48% 361 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950M
Acer(1025 1033) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7654
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Lighting 22.9
Reflection 17.2
Parallax 18.7
19% 19.6 fps
MRender 16.7
Gravity 22.8
Splatting 16.9
15% 18.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SNS8151S396GG 96GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S9FM02.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 65 65 64 55 50 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 393
Write 78
Mixed 185
SusWrite 61.1
39% 179 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 55.5
4K Mixed 18.6
105% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 96.3
DQ Mixed 2.7
29% 68.6 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 55%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
578GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 80 82 81 81 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 79.6
Write 80.2
Mixed 16
SusWrite 80.9
46% 64.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.3% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 25.8
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 22.4
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V5-591G Builds (Compare 362 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V5-591G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback