Acer TravelMate B113

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAcer TravelMate B113  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer BA10_HX
Memory0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '20 at 05:18
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3337U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 89.2
1-Core 71.4
2-Core 112
59% 91 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 165
22% 166 Pts
64-Core 163
10% 163 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Acer(1025 0748) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5129
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.34% Terrible
Lighting 3.73
Reflection 4.92
Parallax 2.72
3% 3.79 fps
MRender 3.86
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.22
4% 4.44 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.34%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac 256GB 256GB
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW200424
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 209 206 209 206 205 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.8% Average
Read 235
Write 210
Mixed 198
SusWrite 205
48% 212 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 32
4K Mixed 8.4
50% 18.3 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 13.9
47% 101 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KDG/2G 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
30.6% Below average
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 8.9
28% 9.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 7.9
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TravelMate B113 Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Acer TravelMate B113

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback