| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 55.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 90.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus X99-M WS/SE (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180626 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 23 '20 at 15:15 |
| Run Duration | 144 Seconds |
| Run User | ROU-User |
| Background CPU | 49% |
PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
|
51.3%
Above average
|
42% 60.3 Pts
|
22% 179 Pts
|
42% 684 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
55.5%
Above average
|
54% 69 fps
|
58% 70.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$73
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 493 91 43 46 89 100 MB/s
|
90.4%
Outstanding
|
108% 481 MB/s
|
136% 43.6 MB/s
|
209% 288 MB/s
|
|
|
55.2%
Above average
|
64% 87.5 MB/s
|
215% 1.5 MB/s
| |
|
WD WD1004FBYZ-01YCBB1 1TB
73GB free
Firmware: RR03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 88 88 85 85 94 MB/s
|
54.3%
Above average
|
64% 87 MB/s
|
165% 1.3 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata DDR4 3200 2OZ 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2448 MHz
|
64.4%
Good
|
71% 24.9 GB/s
|
28% 9.7 GB/s
|
48% 82.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X99-M WS/SE Builds (Compare 59 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus X99-M WS/SE
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 12x |
| Core i7-5930KIntel $150Bench 80%, 34,039 samples | 10x |
| Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples | 8x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 6x |
| GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 5x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $294Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $615 |