Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics44.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive149% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory16.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191224
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 21 '20 at 16:57
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Memory 58.3
1-Core 81.7
2-Core 180
58% 107 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 484
45% 373 Pts
64-Core 498
31% 498 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 109F) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 19.10.30.04
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
44.7% Average
Lighting 58.7
Reflection 57.3
Parallax 47.2
48% 54.4 fps
MRender 44.1
Gravity 47.7
Splatting 48.9
39% 46.9 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1MA0V4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 915 979 755 486 427 425 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
149% Outstanding
Read 1,030
Write 658
Mixed 952
SusWrite 664
185% 826 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 61.8
4K Mixed 42.3
135% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 463
DQ Write 644
DQ Mixed 627
453% 578 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 149%
Great: 181%
Digitazz 240GB SSD 240GB
34GB free
Firmware: 1.07E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 358 265 260 260 260 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 346
Write 348
Mixed 299
SusWrite 295
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 72.3
4K Mixed 29.4
103% 39.8 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 126
118% 182 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 CT16G4SFD8266.M16FJ 24GB
3200, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.7% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 18.7
56% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 18.7
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,839 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback