bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory1.2 GB free of 5 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1708 x 960 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190815
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateJul 21 '20 at 16:55
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
49.6% Average
Memory 49.3
1-Core 57.9
2-Core 147
46% 84.7 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 298
39% 292 Pts
64-Core 231
14% 231 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 68%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware, VMware Virtual S 54GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,813
Write 1,481
Mixed 1,581
362% 1,625 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 35.8
4K Mixed 37.1
125% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 69.1
DQ Write 67.1
DQ Mixed 65.8
50% 67.3 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 82%
Vmware, VMware Virtual S 64GB
47GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,887
Write 1,294
Mixed 1510
347% 1,564 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 36
4K Mixed 34
122% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 69
DQ Write 64.8
DQ Mixed 65.2
49% 66.3 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 88%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
29GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 12 10 12 13 12 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Read 86
Write 14
Mixed 12.7
SusWrite 12.7
30% 31.3 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
28% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-4096MB Virtual RAM VMW-1024MB 5GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 1024 MB
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
42.9% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 15.8
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 11.9
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 163
24% 163 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,465 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback