Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X3 450-$80 4,468 User benchmarks, average bench 44% CPU1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	40% Average	Memory 55.9 1-Core 46.4 2-Core 94 40% 65.4 Pts	4-Core 142 8-Core 140 19% 141 Pts	64-Core 143 9% 143 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% MSI(1462 809F) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.78% Terrible	Lighting 2.23 Reflection 2.62 Parallax 0.59 2% 1.81 fps	MRender 2.38 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 1.74 2% 2.12 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.78% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 190GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 167 180 181 206 184 MB/s Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.6% Average	Read 230 Write 122 Mixed 151 SusWrite 184 38% 172 MB/s	4K Read 15.4 4K Write 32 4K Mixed 16.9 62% 21.4 MB/s	DQ Read 41.7 DQ Write 50.8 DQ Mixed 40.8 32% 44.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 100%
Hitachi HDS722516VLSA80 165GB 513 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 153GB free Firmware: V34OA63A SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 43 43 40 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	28.3% Poor	Read 56.2 Write 40.5 Mixed 32.2 SusWrite 42 32% 42.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BA160B.C16F CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 8GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.6% Poor	MC Read 13.5 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 11.1 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 8.5 22% 7.63 GB/s	Latency 140 28% 140 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	55x
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	33x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	16x

RAM
2x4GBAdataBench 60%, 13,050 samples	12x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	9x
99U5471-054.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 30%, 12,132 samples	9x

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $177