MSI 760GM-P23(FX) (MS-7641)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7641
MotherboardMSI 760GM-P23(FX) (MS-7641)  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130428
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJul 21 '20 at 14:48
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X3 450-$80
CPU1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
40% Average
Memory 55.9
1-Core 46.4
2-Core 94
40% 65.4 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 140
19% 141 Pts
64-Core 143
9% 143 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
MSI(1462 809F) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.78% Terrible
Lighting 2.23
Reflection 2.62
Parallax 0.59
2% 1.81 fps
MRender 2.38
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 1.74
2% 2.12 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.78%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 167 180 181 206 184 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.6% Average
Read 230
Write 122
Mixed 151
SusWrite 184
38% 172 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 32
4K Mixed 16.9
62% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 41.7
DQ Write 50.8
DQ Mixed 40.8
32% 44.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 100%
Hitachi HDS722516VLSA80 165GB
153GB free
Firmware: V34OA63A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 43 43 40 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 56.2
Write 40.5
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 42
32% 42.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160B.C16F CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.6% Poor
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 11.1
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 8.5
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 140
28% 140 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 760GM-P23(FX) (MS-7641) Builds (Compare 491 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 760GM-P23(FX) (MS-7641)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $177
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback