HP Z2 Tower G4 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z2 Tower G4 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8455
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200608
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 21 '20 at 14:44
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$243
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Memory 85.3
1-Core 146
2-Core 291
94% 174 Pts
4-Core 585
8-Core 1,140
102% 863 Pts
64-Core 1,141
71% 1,141 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85B0) 3GB
CLim: 2164 MHz, MLim: 2201 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 451.67
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 0.13
0% 0.13 fps
Poor: 48% Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 2TB-$474
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 907 504 503 258 75 88 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 84% Great: 131%
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000H2 512GB
116GB free
Firmware: EXA71HAQ
SusWrite @10s intervals: 945 601 656 657 658 648 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
283% Outstanding
Read 2,311
Write 1,894
Mixed 1,449
SusWrite 694
354% 1,587 MB/s
4K Read 59.3
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 80
265% 92.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,535
DQ Write 1,420
DQ Mixed 1,434
1,088% 1,463 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 283%
Great: 284%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
820GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 156 168 170 168 169 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 128
Mixed 82
SusWrite 163
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CTD 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 32GB
2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
82% Excellent
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 25
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 33.9
SC Mixed 26.2
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 82%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z2 Tower G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

System: HP Z2 Tower G4 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $186
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback