Asrock X570 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 145% UFO	Desktop 103% UFO	Workstation 165% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	147% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	305% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock X570 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200612
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 21 '20 at 05:58
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	97.8% Outstanding	Memory 85.5 1-Core 156 2-Core 309 99% 183 Pts	4-Core 588 8-Core 1,174 104% 881 Pts	64-Core 2,160 134% 2,160 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 97.8% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Gigabyte(1458 37C4) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 451.67 Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	147% Outstanding	Lighting 200 Reflection 202 Parallax 203 163% 202 fps	MRender 251 Gravity 195 Splatting 135 152% 194 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 147% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$75 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 493GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1605 1548 1574 1494 1468 1573 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	305% Outstanding	Read 2,702 Write 2,287 Mixed 1,834 SusWrite 1,544 468% 2,092 MB/s	4K Read 67.2 4K Write 74.5 4K Mixed 66.7 227% 69.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1307 DQ Write 144 DQ Mixed 264 310% 572 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 305% Great: 410%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 212 216 212 209 206 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GB 11,505 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	127% Outstanding	MC Read 51.3 MC Write 46.2 MC Mixed 45.4 136% 47.6 GB/s	SC Read 29.4 SC Write 26.9 SC Mixed 42 94% 32.8 GB/s	Latency 71.6 56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 136%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X570 Taichi Builds (Compare 2,210 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 164%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 187%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Taichi - $213

CPU
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	399x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $260Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	382x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $190Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	335x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	271x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	151x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	145x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $75Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	171x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	115x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	71x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	122x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 106%, 11,505 samples	68x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 110%, 12,538 samples	38x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $1,582

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $288	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16