Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7300HQ 170,871 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	73% Very good	Memory 79.1 1-Core 106 2-Core 201 73% 129 Pts	4-Core 386 8-Core 393 52% 390 Pts	64-Core 370 23% 370 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 15E0) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	5.45% Terrible	Lighting 5.77 Reflection 24.8 Parallax 5.91 5% 12.2 fps	MRender 5.62 Gravity 5.33 Splatting 12.5 7% 7.82 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.45% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 278GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 347 352 360 350 358 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 458 Write 351 Mixed 326 SusWrite 348 83% 371 MB/s	4K Read 32.2 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 39.6 156% 59.4 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 276 228% 328 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB 122,420 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	36.5% Below average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 10.6 35% 12.4 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 11.5 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 82.3 49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	2,453x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	1,534x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	4x

SSD
SD8SN8U128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 65%, 7,802 samples	274x
SD8SNAT128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 56%, 12,768 samples	250x
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	203x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	665x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	313x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	186x