Supermicro C7Q67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics60.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive56.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro C7Q67  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro C7Q67
Memory21.3 GB free of 24.0078 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130628
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 20 '20 at 21:57
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 97.2
2-Core 190
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 491
52% 414 Pts
64-Core 492
30% 492 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
CLim: 1545 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
60.8% Good
Lighting 76.2
Reflection 79
Parallax 96.7
62% 84 fps
MRender 76.3
Gravity 77.7
Splatting 63
58% 72.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 500GB SSD
242GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 238 143 83 83 83 MB/s
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.9% Above average
Read 255
Write 230
Mixed 216
SusWrite 144
47% 211 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 43.4
4K Mixed 26.7
95% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 149
124% 179 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 96%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
359GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 100 100 100 99 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 105
Write 99.7
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 99.6
66% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLT8G3D1608ET3LX0. F3-10666CL9-4GBNT BLT8G3D1608ET3LX0. F3-10666CL9-4GBNT MXIC 25L Series 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 33 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
49.1% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 15.3
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 16.7
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C7Q67 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Supermicro C7Q67

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback