Asrock Z77 OC Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics78.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive95.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 OC Formula  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime6.2 Days
Run DateJul 19 '20 at 16:22
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 96.5
2-Core 193
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 386
51% 385 Pts
64-Core 360
22% 360 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Lighting 98.3
Reflection 89.1
Parallax 82.5
80% 90 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 82.3
Splatting 77.3
75% 94.1 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
229GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 419 417 433 432 417 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 433
Mixed 409
SusWrite 390
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 60.2
4K Mixed 39.6
126% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 258
200% 274 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 125%
Ct500mx5 0 500GB
113GB free
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 224 222 229 230 222 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 334
Write 227
Mixed 258
SusWrite 214
58% 258 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 54.7
4K Mixed 41
124% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 105
89% 129 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 119%
CT500MX5 E1EC6C88 500GB
86GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 27 28 28 27 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.8% Below average
Read 32.3
Write 28.3
Mixed 30
SusWrite 27.3
40% 29.5 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 6.6
498% 6.67 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 029E CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.7% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 15.6
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 15.8
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 OC Formula Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 OC Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $455
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback