Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3350 14,922 User benchmarks, average bench 21% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	17.1% Very poor	Memory 20.8 1-Core 36.8 2-Core 70.9 23% 42.8 Pts	4-Core 77.6 8-Core 79.1 10% 78.3 Pts	64-Core 75.6 5% 75.6 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 15,538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0100 2782) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6444 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.39% Terrible	Lighting 1.47 Reflection 2.12 Parallax 1.16 1% 1.58 fps	MRender 2.05 Gravity 1.33 Splatting 2.83 2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.39% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x2GB 5,404 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.2% Very poor	MC Read 3.2 MC Write 6.1 MC Mixed 4.3 13% 4.53 GB/s	SC Read 1 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 2.4 6% 2.2 GB/s	Latency 315 13% 315 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 26%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3350IntelBench 21%, 14,922 samples	3x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	2x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 15,538 samples	1x

SSD
860 EVO M.2 500GBSamsungBench 101%, 35,237 samples	2x
TS120GMTS820S 120GBTranscendBench 63%, 2,081 samples	1x

RAM
123456789012345678 2x2GBABCDBench 19%, 5,404 samples	3x