Asus ROG STRIX X399-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive265% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X399-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory41.7 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 19 '20 at 08:08
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.75 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Memory 89.4
1-Core 110
2-Core 231
81% 144 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 885
80% 673 Pts
64-Core 2518
156% 2518 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Lighting 68.7
Reflection 67.7
Parallax 59.6
56% 65.4 fps
MRender 71.3
Gravity 66.4
Splatting 69.4
56% 69 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 963 866 872 858 852 782 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
265% Outstanding
Read 2,540
Write 2,336
Mixed 1,837
SusWrite 865
424% 1,895 MB/s
4K Read 61.6
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 79.2
258% 86.6 MB/s
DQ Read 822
DQ Write 504
DQ Mixed 710
517% 679 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 265%
Great: 355%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
183GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 368 366 364 364 366 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 481
Mixed 434
SusWrite 382
101% 451 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 78.3
4K Mixed 51.1
167% 56.4 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 362
273% 364 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 112%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80
123GB free
Firmware: SD15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 67 67 68 69 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 68.7
Write 69.5
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 68
46% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 59%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
485GB free
Firmware: CC95
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 95 96 97 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 91.3
Write 91.7
Mixed 48.2
SusWrite 95.4
60% 81.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$89
205GB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 89 89 90 89 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 87.5
Write 90
Mixed 54
SusWrite 88.4
59% 80 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 6x8GB
6 of 8 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
58% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 18.2
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 21.4
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X399-E GAMING Builds (Compare 350 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 148%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X399-E GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $874
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback