Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 89% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 83% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	98.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181209
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 19 '20 at 04:36
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	86.4% Excellent	Memory 84.6 1-Core 122 2-Core 242 83% 150 Pts	4-Core 474 8-Core 812 78% 643 Pts	64-Core 999 62% 999 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 86.4% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Asus(1043 868E) CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 3605 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	98.1% Outstanding	Lighting 126 Reflection 120 Parallax 122 103% 123 fps	MRender 141 Gravity 108 Splatting 87.3 89% 112 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 98.1% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 239GB 1,211 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: 9.2 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 865 Write 1,010 Mixed 623 186% 833 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 79.4 4K Mixed 36 129% 47.4 MB/s	DQ Read 258 DQ Write 565 DQ Mixed 215 220% 346 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 99%
Amd-raid Array 3 500GB 78 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 209GB free Firmware: 9.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 191 193 198 195 194 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	82.3% Excellent	Read 477 Write 376 Mixed 440 SusWrite 194 83% 372 MB/s	4K Read 25.3 4K Write 87.4 4K Mixed 36.7 132% 49.8 MB/s	DQ Read 130 DQ Write 349 DQ Mixed 139 135% 206 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 202%
Amd-raid Array 2 2TB 806 User benchmarks, average bench 129% 597GB free Firmware: 9.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 152 158 159 157 158 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	95.3% Outstanding	Read 174 Write 228 Mixed 90.5 SusWrite 157 119% 162 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 1.6 313% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 95.3% Great: 201%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB 4,583 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3266 MHz clocked @ 1633 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	120% Outstanding	MC Read 45.8 MC Write 44 MC Mixed 41.4 125% 43.7 GB/s	SC Read 28 SC Write 44.5 SC Mixed 34.2 102% 35.6 GB/s	Latency 72.5 55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 117%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 938 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 79%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	129x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	115x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	96x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	94x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	68x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	37x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	32x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	29x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	57x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	36x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $745

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16