MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics85% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190703
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 18 '20 at 05:20
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Memory 80.9
1-Core 149
2-Core 300
95% 177 Pts
4-Core 583
8-Core 950
94% 767 Pts
64-Core 1425
88% 1425 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
Gigabyte(1458 37D9) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 108
Parallax 103
86% 105 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 96.2
Splatting 82.8
82% 104 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 85%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,625
Write 2,264
Mixed 1601
480% 2,163 MB/s
4K Read 65.6
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 91.7
316% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,007
DQ Write 1,181
DQ Mixed 1164
858% 1,117 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Amd-raid ADATA SU800 512GB
32GB free
Firmware: Q120
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 260 266 250 271 259 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 460
Write 395
Mixed 388
SusWrite 278
85% 380 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 44.5
4K Mixed 30
89% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 76.7
76% 120 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 80%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 840 120GB
74GB free
Firmware: EXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 116 111 99 85 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
69% Good
Read 463
Write 328
Mixed 371
SusWrite 138
72% 325 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 53.8
4K Mixed 31.1
116% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 86.1
83% 127 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 69%
Great: 77%
Amd-raid TOSHIBA DT01ABA1 1TB
431GB free
Firmware: MU2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 121 130 132 133 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 143
Write 120
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 128
76% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$36
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 32.3
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 22.5
SC Mixed 33
78% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 6,098 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $980
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback