HP 245 G1 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive20.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP 245 G1 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 188B
Memory3.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '20 at 03:39
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 70%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-300 APU-$120
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Memory 33.7
1-Core 15.5
2-Core 21
17% 23.4 Pts
4-Core 24.2
8-Core 28.2
3% 26.2 Pts
64-Core 27.2
2% 27.2 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310
HP(103C 188B) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.85% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.27
Parallax 1.22
1% 1.16 fps
MRender 1.29
Gravity 0.63
Splatting 1.39
1% 1.1 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.85%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SV100S2128G 128GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 120229
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 104 96 28 49 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
20.6% Poor
Read 169
Write 141
Mixed 114
SusWrite 73.5
28% 124 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 10.1
4K Mixed 7.9
26% 8.27 MB/s
DQ Read 11.3
DQ Write 49.1
DQ Mixed 14.9
16% 25.1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325S6CFR8C-PB Kingston HP16D3LS1KFG/4G 6GB
800, 800 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
9.82% Terrible
MC Read 3.5
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 3.4
9% 3.23 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 3.5
8% 2.63 GB/s
Latency 234
17% 234 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.82%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 245 G1 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 245 G1 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback