Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409JA_X409JA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409JA_X409JA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X409JA
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191205
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateJul 16 '20 at 19:50
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 74.1
1-Core 104
2-Core 162
67% 113 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 267
34% 255 Pts
64-Core 273
17% 273 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Asus(1043 1EB1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7372
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
4.33% Terrible
Lighting 4.63
Reflection 5
Parallax 4.5
4% 4.71 fps
MRender 5.38
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 8.78
5% 6.29 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.33%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1202 256GB
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20200000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 417 360 411 405 412 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 1,123
Write 1,070
Mixed 906
SusWrite 410
196% 877 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 55
207% 77.5 MB/s
DQ Read 787
DQ Write 691
DQ Mixed 695
533% 725 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 166%
Great: 189%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
36.9% Below average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 10.5
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 11.2
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 92.3
43% 92.3 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409JA_X409JA Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409JA_X409JA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback