ADD TO PC
BUILD

Sony VPCYB36KG

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Sony VPCYB36KG (all builds)
Motherboard	Sony VAIO
Memory	0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit 色彩
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110613
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 11 '17 at 07:03
Run Duration	201 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-450 APU 9,307 User benchmarks, average bench 26% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	28.8% Poor	Memory 52.3 1-Core 19 2-Core 23.9 24% 31.7 Pts	4-Core 33.2 8-Core 34.7 4% 34 Pts	64-Core 34.1 2% 34.1 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320 8,182 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sony(104D 9082) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	0.9% Terrible	Lighting 1.07 Reflection 1.46 Parallax 1.34 1% 1.29 fps	MRender 1.33 Gravity 0.67 Splatting 1.39 1% 1.13 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.9% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series 240GB-$142 4,505 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 193GB free (System drive) Firmware: LH6i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 41798621724876 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 689 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 689 (B7) Unknown 100 100 634 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 97 97 3 (BE) vendor-specific 43 57 68723212331 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 689 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 5122 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 76313 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 52 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 76313 (F2) Unknown 100 100 85060 (F9) Unknown 100 100 2189	51.3% Above average	Read 422 Write 233 Mixed 306 71% 320 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 33 4K Mixed 13.3 60% 21.2 MB/s	DQ Read 49.8 DQ Write 40.6 DQ Mixed 25.6 24% 38.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 89%
Jmicron Generic 256GB 199 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 199GB free Firmware: 8101 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	18.4% Very poor	Read 31.4 Write 29.8 Mixed 30.2 23% 30.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.26 4K Write 5.64 4K Mixed 4.26 756% 4.72 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 23%
SanDisk SDSSDXPS240G 240GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 131GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	29.2% Poor	Read 29.9 Write 27.8 Mixed 27.2 36% 28.3 MB/s	4K Read 5.84 4K Write 5.66 4K Mixed 3.61 337% 5.03 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 78%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata EL7YG1B1672ZG 4GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1066, 1066 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.6% Very poor	MC Read 3.6 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 4.3 11% 3.9 GB/s	SC Read 0.5 SC Write 2.5 SC Mixed 2.5 5% 1.83 GB/s	Latency 152 26% 152 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback