Sony VPCEG20EL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemSony VPCEG20EL  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110623
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 15 '20 at 17:14
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2330M-$150
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
22.7% Poor
Memory 41.3
1-Core 4.4
2-Core 10.5
16% 18.7 Pts
4-Core 26.3
8-Core 27.4
4% 26.8 Pts
64-Core 7.5
0% 7.5 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Sony(104D 908A) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
0.7% Terrible
Lighting 0.77
Reflection 1.15
Parallax 0.47
1% 0.8 fps
MRender 1.43
Gravity 0.43
Splatting 1.22
1% 1.03 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.7%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 33 31 28 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
24.4% Poor
Read 52.8
Write 62.4
Mixed 39
SusWrite 32.1
34% 46.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
75% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 HMT325S6CFR8C-H9 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 5.4
16% 5.73 GB/s
SC Read 0.9
SC Write 1.5
SC Mixed 0.5
3% 0.97 GB/s
Latency 196
20% 196 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback