Acer Aspire 5930

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire 5930  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Eiger
Memory1.8 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080813
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 15 '20 at 15:09
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User ARM-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo P7350-$43
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Memory 69.8
1-Core 28.4
2-Core 54.3
36% 50.8 Pts
4-Core 55.2
8-Core 55.2
7% 55.2 Pts
64-Core 56
4% 56 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600M-GT
Acer(1025 013F) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 331.82
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
2.09% Terrible
Lighting 2.37
Reflection 4.65
Parallax 0.81
2% 2.61 fps
MRender 4.33
Gravity 1.63
Splatting 2.91
2% 2.96 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.09%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS54252 250GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C31P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 35 41 44 47 48 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Read 37.9
Write 42.8
Mixed 24
SusWrite 41.3
27% 36.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
17.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 4.8
15% 5.23 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 5
14% 4.93 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 5930 Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 5930

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 17% - Very poor Total price: $120
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback