Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics49.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190628
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 15 '20 at 06:06
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 84.2
1-Core 122
2-Core 239
83% 148 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 768
73% 602 Pts
64-Core 955
59% 955 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.7.2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
49.6% Average
Lighting 61.8
Reflection 64.7
Parallax 77.6
50% 68 fps
MRender 65.4
Gravity 59.8
Splatting 53.8
48% 59.7 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS120G2G0B-00EPW0 120GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UI510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 40 1.9 6.4 2.5 6.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 434
Write 240
Mixed 177
SusWrite 37
49% 222 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 16.8
4K Mixed 7.7
52% 15.4 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 62.4
DQ Mixed 42
44% 73.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 52%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
109GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 79 80 80 80 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
45% Average
Read 76.3
Write 89.3
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 80
56% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
56% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 16.7
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 18.5
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,714 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $413
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback