Asrock FM2A55M-HD+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A55M-HD+  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 10 '17 at 14:55
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-6400K APU-$81
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
50.3% Above average
Memory 82.6
1-Core 70.9
2-Core 104
55% 85.7 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 108
14% 108 Pts
64-Core 108
7% 108 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8470D + HD 6670 Dual Graphics
MSI(1462 8111) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
5.36% Terrible
Lighting 7.03
Reflection 7.19
Parallax 6.97
6% 7.06 fps
MRender 5.38
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 5.3
5% 5.7 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.36%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABF032 320GB-$37
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AM00 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 78.3
Write 74.1
Mixed 73.5
57% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.39
4K Mixed 0.18
60% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 57%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$71
200GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 69.7
Write 71.2
Mixed 44.7
46% 61.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.28
72% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 41%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
168GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 92
Write 94.8
Mixed 92.1
70% 93 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.99
4K Mixed 0.26
83% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-016.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.9% Poor
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 9.4
25% 8.83 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 9.6
24% 8.53 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A55M-HD+ Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A55M-HD+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $116
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback