Packard EasyNote TS11HR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemPackard EasyNote TS11HR  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard SJV50_HR
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120809
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJul 13 '20 at 22:06
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 75%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
43.8% Average
Memory 82.6
1-Core 17.5
2-Core 22.6
34% 40.9 Pts
4-Core 33.9
8-Core 33.8
4% 33.8 Pts
64-Core 34.6
2% 34.6 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Acer(1025 0511) 2GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
1.11% Terrible
Lighting 1.23
Reflection 4.27
Parallax 0.81
1% 2.11 fps
MRender 1.71
Gravity 0.73
Splatting 2.13
1% 1.53 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.11%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF2204RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 74 57 75 87 86 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.3% Poor
Read 247
Write 242
Mixed 128
SusWrite 82
39% 175 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 12.3
4K Mixed 6.7
29% 9.3 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 71.1
DQ Mixed 12.6
29% 61.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 56%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35
165GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 43 37 50 54 63 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 67.4
Write 67.2
Mixed 40.4
SusWrite 49.5
41% 56.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 50%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
290GB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 14 13 17 18 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 28
Write 23.5
Mixed 22.4
SusWrite 16.6
30% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.3
61% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CK0 Kingston ACR512X64D3S13C9G 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
38.1% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 14
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 8.9
28% 9.77 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EasyNote TS11HR Builds (Compare 218 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote TS11HR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $188
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback