MSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7977
MotherboardMSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977)  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170515
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 13 '20 at 21:12
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 30%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Memory 85.3
1-Core 142
2-Core 286
93% 171 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 773
77% 629 Pts
64-Core 787
49% 787 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 3975 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 23
Parallax 18.7
16% 20.5 fps
MRender 28.5
Gravity 19.9
Splatting 26
20% 24.8 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 SATA M.2 250GB-$90
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 449 461 466 458 449 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 472
Mixed 384
SusWrite 450
100% 443 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 47.1
170% 64.2 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 254
219% 323 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 114%
Great: 112%
Crucial MX200 mSATA 250GB
82GB free
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 454 462 466 378 299 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 471
Mixed 382
SusWrite 414
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 47.9
173% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 254
219% 323 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 113%
Great: 107%
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
177GB free
Firmware: UG2204RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 219 207 217 210 202 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 454
Write 364
Mixed 314
SusWrite 236
76% 342 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 48
4K Mixed 16.3
82% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 32.3
45% 83.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 61%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
130GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 225 83 83 82 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 190
Mixed 423
SusWrite 164
72% 323 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 52.1
188% 70.9 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 360
271% 361 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 105%
Great: 121%
Asmt 2115 500GB
100GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 363 373 332 122 123 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 321
Write 334
Mixed 184
SusWrite 263
62% 275 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 48
4K Mixed 22
91% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 49.3
63% 114 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 76%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$132
2TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 153 151 153 152 152 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 148
Write 150
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 152
93% 128 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
276% 2 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74% Very good
MC Read 26
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 23.1
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 30.8
SC Mixed 23.9
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 74%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977) Builds (Compare 4,967 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $713
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback