Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics88.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive402% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory58.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 13 '20 at 14:10
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Memory 84.4
1-Core 142
2-Core 284
92% 170 Pts
4-Core 569
8-Core 1,124
100% 847 Pts
64-Core 2,138
132% 2,138 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2028 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 123
Parallax 103
90% 112 fps
MRender 101
Gravity 104
Splatting 108
86% 104 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SX8200PNP 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42AZS6AC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2378 2390 2396 2401 2396 2401 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
402% Outstanding
Read 2,681
Write 2,404
Mixed 248
SusWrite 2,394
431% 1,932 MB/s
4K Read 63.4
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 90.6
306% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,292
DQ Write 1,097
DQ Mixed 677
649% 1,022 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 402%
Great: 370%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$95
3.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 186 186 185 186 186 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 185
Mixed 86.8
SusWrite 185
116% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
788GB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 103 105 103 103 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 140
Write 108
Mixed 78.1
SusWrite 102
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 104%
ADATA HD710 PRO 4TB
2.5TB free, PID a75a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 112
Write 96.6
Mixed 80.5
120% 96.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.7
214% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 61%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB
21GB free, PID 0743
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 32 32 32 32 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
24.5% Poor
Read 39.6
Write 37.7
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 32.4
50% 36.6 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 4.5
292% 5.23 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 37%
Verbatim STORE N GO 16GB
14GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 4.3 5.5 5.2 5.5 4.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
4.99% Terrible
Read 19.2
Write 0.5
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 4.7
7% 7.23 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.99%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
124% Outstanding
MC Read 50.6
MC Write 44.8
MC Mixed 43.4
132% 46.3 GB/s
SC Read 28.1
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 41.3
92% 32.1 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 124%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,933 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,000
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback