Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 10 '17 at 02:47
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
63.2% Good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 56.1
2-Core 113
54% 84.6 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 339
35% 283 Pts
64-Core 340
21% 340 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.251.0.0
Relative performance (0th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 19.2
Reflection 27.8
Parallax 28.9
16% 25.3 fps
MRender 20.4
Gravity 23.5
Splatting 19.3
17% 21.1 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Neutron GTX 120GB-$79
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M311 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 361
Write 287
Mixed 336
73% 328 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 76
4K Mixed 15.8
95% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 25.7
DQ Write 83.9
DQ Mixed 15.5
23% 41.7 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 95%
WD Purple 4TB (2014)-$71
996GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 111
Write 108
Mixed 104
81% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 2.67
4K Mixed 0.26
108% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
412GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 143
Write 134
Mixed 126
101% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 2.56
4K Mixed 0.31
114% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 109%
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB
315GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 61.5
Write 58.9
Mixed 57.6
45% 59.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.79
4K Mixed 0.19
67% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 49%
WD WD20EURX 2TB-$39
94GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 114
Write 113
Mixed 101
82% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.12
4K Write 1.37
4K Mixed 0.21
54% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5471-004.A01LF Corsair CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
30.2% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 10.5
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 8.5
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 Builds (Compare 235 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback