Today's hottest deals

Zoostorm 7200-0183A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemZoostorm 7200-0183A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK A68HM-PLUS
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181017
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 13 '20 at 01:19
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-7400K APU (2014 D.Ka)
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Memory 48.2
1-Core 66.7
2-Core 102
43% 72.2 Pts
4-Core 98.3
8-Core 101
13% 99.8 Pts
64-Core 101
6% 101 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Nvidia(10DE 1D01) 2GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Lighting 22
Reflection 17.1
Parallax 19.8
18% 19.6 fps
MRender 16.1
Gravity 20.9
Splatting 22.9
17% 20 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$42
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 68 57 68 57 68 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 68.5
Write 63.3
Mixed 38.1
SusWrite 63.5
43% 58.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.5% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 10
25% 8.83 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 10.3
23% 8.03 GB/s
Latency 168
24% 168 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7200-0183A Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Zoostorm 7200-0183A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback