Lenovo 80UD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80UD  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory3.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180706
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateJul 13 '20 at 00:50
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 76%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6498DU
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
44.8% Average
Memory 67.6
1-Core 37.6
2-Core 104
43% 69.9 Pts
4-Core 129
8-Core 133
17% 131 Pts
64-Core 79.8
5% 79.8 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 M430
Legend(17AA 3829) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 26.20.15029.27017
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
4.54% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 7.46
Parallax 10
5% 7.7 fps
MRender 3.86
Gravity 6.83
Splatting 5.57
4% 5.42 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.54%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
252GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX1P6E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 43 48 51 50 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Read 44.5
Write 65.5
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 51
33% 45.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G2AZ 1315 CT8G4SFS8266.M8FE 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.1% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 10.7
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 12.6
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80UD Builds (Compare 936 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80UD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback