Gigabyte GA-F2A85XM-HD3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive44.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A85XM-HD3  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.9 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121105
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 12 '20 at 18:26
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
56.3% Above average
Memory 79.2
1-Core 37.3
2-Core 77.3
44% 64.6 Pts
4-Core 199
8-Core 182
26% 191 Pts
64-Core 197
12% 197 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS1 20G2G0A-00JH30 120GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 22 23 29 36 34 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 432
Write 210
Mixed 253
SusWrite 53.9
52% 237 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 29.2
4K Mixed 16.8
65% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 60.8
DQ Mixed 21.2
33% 65.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 53%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
784GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 130 130 129 132 131 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 161
Mixed 134
SusWrite 130
113% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
245% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/ KHX1866C10D3/ 8GB
933, 933 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
32.6% Below average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 11.3
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 10.6
22% 7.77 GB/s
Latency 82.1
49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A85XM-HD3 Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A85XM-HD3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $126
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback