bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DH67BL
Memory17.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101115
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJul 12 '20 at 10:11
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$201
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 24,644,748 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 91
1-Core 87.5
2-Core 158
68% 112 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 461
48% 386 Pts
64-Core 418
26% 418 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Zotac(19DA 6222) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 266 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.77% Terrible
Lighting 2.23
Reflection 2.54
Parallax 1.81
2% 2.19 fps
MRender 2.33
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 1.74
2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.77%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 116 113 117 115 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 476
Write 450
Mixed 379
SusWrite 150
81% 364 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 52.6
4K Mixed 37.9
124% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 352
267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 115%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
154GB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 83 78 81 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 66.7
Write 68.2
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 80.8
47% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.3% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 12.2
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 13.4
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,464 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback