Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 159%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics155% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory115.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180625
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateJul 12 '20 at 02:45
Run Duration459 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7980XE-$993
CPU0, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 75.5
1-Core 108
2-Core 217
74% 134 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 860
76% 645 Pts
64-Core 2,614
162% 2,614 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 95%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Gigabyte(1458 3774) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 148
Parallax 124
106% 134 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 130
Splatting 109
96% 119 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
155% Outstanding
Lighting 209
Reflection 229
Parallax 255
171% 231 fps
MRender 264
Gravity 228
Splatting 140
165% 211 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 155%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$4
268GB free
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 748 534 533 532 532 529 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 2,361
Write 1,461
Mixed 646
SusWrite 568
277% 1,259 MB/s
4K Read 60.6
4K Write 42.8
4K Mixed 49.5
178% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 875
DQ Write 807
DQ Mixed 857
639% 846 MB/s
Poor: 148%
This bench: 221%
Great: 293%
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
140GB free
Firmware: X41320RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 205 195 193 188 195 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 479
Write 459
Mixed 337
SusWrite 236
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 58.4
4K Mixed 36.5
123% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 248
211% 311 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 87%
Great: 101%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 500GB-$70
466GB free
Firmware: X61170RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 466 414 394 392 395 395 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 468
Mixed 376
SusWrite 409
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 60.2
4K Mixed 37.6
126% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 260
212% 304 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 119%
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$4
477GB free
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 906 522 520 523 519 516 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
265% Outstanding
Read 2,339
Write 1,496
Mixed 1,262
SusWrite 584
315% 1,420 MB/s
4K Read 66.4
4K Write 177
4K Mixed 95.7
317% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 866
DQ Write 800
DQ Mixed 849
632% 838 MB/s
Poor: 148%
This bench: 265%
Great: 293%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 500GB-$70
466GB free
Firmware: X61170RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 419 413 407 409 386 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 405
Mixed 351
SusWrite 417
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 61
4K Mixed 36.7
125% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 241
198% 285 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
118% Outstanding
MC Read 40.7
MC Write 62.2
MC Mixed 42.4
138% 48.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 10
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 118%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 367 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $1,000
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback