Asrock H61M-VS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H61M-VS  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20120910
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 09 '17 at 15:10
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$199
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 90.5
1-Core 89.9
2-Core 166
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 454
46% 373 Pts
64-Core 453
28% 453 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 2151 MHz, MLim: 1852 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.66
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Lighting 39
Reflection 29.2
Parallax 40.1
32% 36.1 fps
MRender 40.1
Gravity 36.4
Splatting 36.7
31% 37.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK3265GSXN 320GB
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GH101M Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 67.7
Write 74.2
Mixed 21.4
40% 54.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.25
75% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 48%
Samsung HD160JJ/P 160GB-$40
91GB free
Firmware: ZM100-34 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 59.3
Write 56.6
Mixed 13.6
31% 43.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.04
4K Write 1.71
4K Mixed 0.44
82% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 34%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
68GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 71.8
Write 55.6
Mixed 22.5
37% 50 MB/s
4K Read 0.21
4K Write 1.11
4K Mixed 0.12
43% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1333 C9 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
29.5% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 8.6
26% 9.13 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9
26% 9.23 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-VS Builds (Compare 377 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $77
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback