Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150324
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 11 '20 at 05:30
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 72.7
2-Core 144
60% 99.6 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 426
44% 356 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.150.2211.0
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Lighting 65
Reflection 58.1
Parallax 73.4
53% 65.5 fps
MRender 56.7
Gravity 38.9
Splatting 72.6
48% 56.1 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force 240GB-$170
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 55 62 55 56 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 197
Write 76
Mixed 120
SusWrite 59
25% 113 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 24
80% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 75.8
DQ Mixed 106
80% 108 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 57%
WD Green 750GB (2009)-$60
392GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 70 69 68 69 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 73.5
Write 69.8
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 68.8
50% 67.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GBH2X02E99924-165 Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 4GBH2X02E99924-165 Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.1% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 7.6
24% 8.53 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 8.1
24% 8.33 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $358
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549WD Black SN850X M.2 4TB $293
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback