Asus N550JK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus N550JK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N550JK
Memory9.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190612
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 11 '20 at 01:04
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 102
2-Core 198
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 506
56% 442 Pts
64-Core 503
31% 503 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 11CD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.04% Terrible
Lighting 4.07
Reflection 15.8
Parallax 7.16
3% 9.02 fps
MRender 8.86
Gravity 2.43
Splatting 8.26
6% 6.52 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.04%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 291 290 290 291 290 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 453
Write 438
Mixed 386
SusWrite 292
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 89.9
4K Mixed 44.7
148% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 358
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 124%
Seagate ST1500LM006 HN-M151RAD 1.5TB
795GB free
Firmware: 2BC10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 93 93 93 93 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 84.8
Write 71
Mixed 51.2
SusWrite 90.2
55% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.6
164% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 M471B1G73QH0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
40.7% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 11.7
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.4
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N550JK Builds (Compare 823 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N550JK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $446
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback