Asus P9X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics96% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive82.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P9X79  (all builds)
Memory14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 09 '17 at 08:12
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4820K-$110
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88% Excellent
Memory 95.7
1-Core 120
2-Core 239
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 591
65% 515 Pts
64-Core 598
37% 598 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 88%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2252 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 378.77
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 127
Parallax 109
98% 119 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 113
Splatting 111
91% 112 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 96%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor M5S 128GB-$75
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 492
Write 206
Mixed 283
72% 327 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 76
4K Mixed 32.9
131% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 72.2
97% 179 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 84%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
931GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 148
Write 127
Mixed 120
99% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.15
4K Write 2.06
4K Mixed 0.56
148% 1.25 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 76%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
137GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 112
Write 110
Mixed 102
81% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.21
4K Mixed 0.25
115% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 109%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
305GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 104
Write 96.1
Mixed 90.5
73% 97 MB/s
4K Read 1.12
4K Write 1.92
4K Mixed 0.53
142% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
66.9% Good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 22.7
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 14.5
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 55
73% 55 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 Builds (Compare 1,720 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $654
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback