Asrock 990FX Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 990FX Killer  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '20 at 21:32
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 89.4
1-Core 72.5
2-Core 143
62% 102 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 419
44% 350 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
Sapphire(1DA2 E367) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Lighting 18.2
Reflection 30.3
Parallax 21.8
15% 23.5 fps
MRender 28.6
Gravity 16.1
Splatting 32.9
22% 25.8 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 395 410 338 270 399 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
92% Outstanding
Read 453
Write 417
Mixed 363
SusWrite 360
90% 398 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 62.5
4K Mixed 38.4
130% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 241
186% 254 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 92%
Great: 111%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 670GB
499GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 27 28 56 36 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.7% Below average
Read 459
Write 65
Mixed 96.3
SusWrite 33
35% 163 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 10.1
4K Mixed 3.1
37% 10.6 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 31.5
DQ Mixed 36.4
52% 103 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 46%
Sm951 NVMe SAMSUNG 256GB
211GB free
Firmware: BXW74D0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 493 522 524 526 520 512 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 669
Write 527
Mixed 488
SusWrite 516
124% 550 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 75.1
4K Mixed 44.4
153% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 462
DQ Write 387
DQ Mixed 438
324% 429 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 125%
Great: 236%
Sm951 NVMe SAMSUNG 256GB
237GB free
Firmware: BXW74D0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 891 952 954 961 946 927 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
165% Outstanding
Read 1,075
Write 974
Mixed 684
SusWrite 939
206% 918 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 78.1
4K Mixed 46.1
147% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 463
DQ Write 367
DQ Mixed 436
320% 422 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 165%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391B1G73QH0-YK0 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.3% Average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 17.1
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 13.9
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 990FX Killer Builds (Compare 259 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Killer - $154

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $494
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback