MSI FM2-A55M-P33 (MS-7721)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics49.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7721
MotherboardMSI FM2-A55M-P33 (MS-7721)  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131012
Uptime16.1 Days
Run DateJul 10 '20 at 20:41
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)-$467
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 74.3
2-Core 142
61% 99.8 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 231
31% 230 Pts
64-Core 230
14% 230 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
49.4% Average
Lighting 62.1
Reflection 63
Parallax 82.3
51% 69.1 fps
MRender 63.7
Gravity 59.9
Splatting 51.2
47% 58.3 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG2204RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 123 147 160 149 141 MB/s
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.6% Average
Read 226
Write 206
Mixed 187
SusWrite 150
43% 192 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 13
62% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 64.2
DQ Mixed 32
39% 70.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
218GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 93 93 93 94 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 100
Write 96.5
Mixed 57
SusWrite 92.6
64% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.C8F CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.3% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 10.1
28% 9.93 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 9.4
24% 8.3 GB/s
Latency 74.8
53% 74.8 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2-A55M-P33 (MS-7721) Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI FM2-A55M-P33 (MS-7721)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $86
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback