Toshiba SATELLITE PRO L870-122

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemToshiba SATELLITE PRO L870-122  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '20 at 18:38
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
54.4% Above average
Memory 75.6
1-Core 79.8
2-Core 149
60% 102 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 191
26% 193 Pts
64-Core 193
12% 193 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7600M
Toshiba(1179 FB41) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.87% Terrible
Lighting 6.27
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 5.34
5% 6.04 fps
MRender 5.71
Gravity 4.77
Splatting 5.61
4% 5.36 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.87%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
437GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 423 432 365 363 363 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 447
Write 425
Mixed 395
SusWrite 392
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 48.9
4K Mixed 32.8
106% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 391
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 358
272% 367 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-051.A00LF Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
50.2% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 14.9
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 89.1
45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback