Asus P8H67-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics79.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive35.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130912
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJul 10 '20 at 18:09
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3450-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 95.4
1-Core 97.4
2-Core 194
76% 129 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 370
50% 370 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.50
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.9% Very good
Lighting 98.2
Reflection 111
Parallax 103
80% 104 fps
MRender 96.2
Gravity 97.3
Splatting 97.7
80% 97.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vaseky V800/350G 350GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0222A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 144 19 22 85 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 386
Write 319
Mixed 289
SusWrite 90.9
60% 271 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 23
4K Mixed 1
49% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 22.9
DQ Write 32.1
DQ Mixed 1
8% 18.7 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 79%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$46
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 132 131 131 132 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
74% Very good
Read 127
Write 125
Mixed 81.9
SusWrite 131
86% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 74%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.4% Good
MC Read 23
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 21
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 19.2
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 56
72% 56 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M Builds (Compare 400 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $238
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback