Huananzhi X79-8D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics46.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardHuananzhi X79-8D  (all builds)
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '20 at 15:26
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
58% Above average
Memory 59.5
1-Core 86.7
2-Core 167
58% 104 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 603
54% 453 Pts
64-Core 1,890
117% 1,890 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 58%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1390 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
46.8% Average
Lighting 57.4
Reflection 68.3
Parallax 71.8
47% 65.8 fps
MRender 65.3
Gravity 53.5
Splatting 54.4
47% 57.7 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
271GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 634 231 234 235 233 235 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
380GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 123 124 122 124 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 112
Write 116
Mixed 72
SusWrite 122
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- M393B1K70QB0- M393B1K70DH0- M393B1K70QB0- 32GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.5% Above average
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 22
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 4.3
15% 5.4 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79-8D Builds (Compare 158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Huananzhi X79-8D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $198
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback