Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '20 at 14:46
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690-$51
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 96.5
1-Core 114
2-Core 193
80% 134 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 439
49% 386 Pts
64-Core 448
28% 448 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Lighting 38.4
Reflection 34.6
Parallax 46.6
31% 39.9 fps
MRender 30.8
Gravity 33.6
Splatting 40.1
29% 34.8 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon IT LCS-256L9S-HP 256GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9C08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 416 388 422 399 360 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 466
Write 356
Mixed 294
SusWrite 400
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 83.7
4K Mixed 42.1
150% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 214
194% 294 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 104%
Great: 102%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA640 3TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: MKAOAA50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 137 139 139 140 138 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 90.5
Write 94.3
Mixed 58
SusWrite 138
70% 95.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
203% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/4G KHX1866C10D3/4G Samsung M378B5173BH0-CK0 Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 16GB
1333, 1333, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.8% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 26
78% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 21.2
SC Mixed 25
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 52.3
76% 52.3 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,814 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $925
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback