HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive74.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84FD
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200528
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 09 '20 at 02:21
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 92.2
1-Core 134
2-Core 234
88% 154 Pts
4-Core 415
8-Core 730
69% 573 Pts
64-Core 944
58% 944 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
EVGA(3842 3162) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 124
Parallax 130
107% 129 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 116
Splatting 105
106% 135 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 105%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv256g TOSHIBA 256GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ADHA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 51 16 42 13 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 619
Write 234
Mixed 199
SusWrite 42.2
60% 274 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 28.7
121% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 71
100% 190 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 147%
WD Blue 3D 1TB-$85
926GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 451 450 453 454 449 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 453
Mixed 362
SusWrite 450
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 32.8
107% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 272
219% 310 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 121%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
644GB free
Firmware: HPH4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 153 151 154 155 154 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Read 148
Write 145
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 153
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 112%
G-raid Thunderbolt 3 20TB
18.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 450 448 454 452 449 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
255% Outstanding
Read 433
Write 433
Mixed 251
SusWrite 449
287% 392 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 3.4
1,283% 9.43 MB/s
Poor: 141%
This bench: 255%
Great: 254%
Hitachi G-DRIVE with Thu 6TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 212 216 216 215 209 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 209
Write 198
Mixed 90.6
SusWrite 213
130% 178 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
197% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 121%
Great: 122%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4U6D8ME-16X KHX2666C16/16G 32GB
2666, 2666 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
87.9% Excellent
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 28.2
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 25.8
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 6,157 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $329
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback