Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 148%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics136% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190708
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 08 '20 at 20:18
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Memory 83.7
1-Core 142
2-Core 284
92% 170 Pts
4-Core 565
8-Core 1,124
100% 844 Pts
64-Core 2,103
130% 2,103 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Zotac(19DA 2503) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
136% Outstanding
Lighting 182
Reflection 193
Parallax 186
148% 187 fps
MRender 238
Gravity 180
Splatting 118
139% 179 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 136%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$164
431GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM11.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 991 637 727 710 619 782 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 1,899
Write 3,175
Mixed 1,967
SusWrite 745
440% 1,946 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 16.8
158% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,338
DQ Write 1,126
DQ Mixed 1,266
939% 1,244 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 221%
Great: 472%
Amd-raid Array 1 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 798 805 803 774 807 804 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 829
Write 836
Mixed 580
SusWrite 798
171% 761 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 28.3
136% 61 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 357
DQ Mixed 250
197% 267 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 135%
Great: 499%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 444 444 443 443 444 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 474
Write 445
Mixed 380
SusWrite 441
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 34.5
4K Mixed 26.3
86% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 296
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 212
163% 225 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 97%
WD My Passport 0820 2TB
838GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 61 63 81 81 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 78.5
Write 30
Mixed 35.3
SusWrite 71
68% 53.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
43% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 43.2
MC Write 36.4
MC Mixed 39.2
113% 39.6 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 35.4
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 107%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,040 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,008
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback