| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 75.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock B365M-ITX/ac (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20181226 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 08 '20 at 18:00 |
| Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
| Run User | HKG-User |
| Background CPU | 15% |
PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9400F-$96
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
|
88.7%
Excellent
|
87% 156 Pts
|
69% 528 Pts
|
43% 698 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1974 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
75.2%
Very good
|
75% 99.5 fps
|
75% 91.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue SN500 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$37
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 201000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
|
242% 1,082 MB/s
|
135% 46.5 MB/s
|
798% 1,066 MB/s
| |
|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
34GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 406 421 236 141 80 MB/s
|
94.1%
Outstanding
|
86% 384 MB/s
|
138% 46.1 MB/s
|
270% 362 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5702-025.A00G 99U5702-020.A00G 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
72.4%
Very good
|
74% 25.8 GB/s
|
59% 20.5 GB/s
|
60% 66.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical B365M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 316 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock B365M-ITX/ac
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 62x |
| Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 37x |
| Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 28x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $238Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 19x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $294Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 18x |
| UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples | 15x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 91% - Outstanding | Total price: $376 |